From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: D Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: dw.el Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 21:27:44 +0200 Message-ID: <70b6da66-1dd8-ef53-c647-1e01b8f8ae80@posteo.net> References: <9388a32f-ddc2-19bf-d11d-b6fe65ce1fdc@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23839"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 02 21:28:48 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lSPTM-00066y-Cf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 21:28:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57252 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSPTL-0006DB-Ec for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 15:28:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSPSV-0005jy-Le for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 15:27:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:57511) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSPSR-0003J2-2h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 15:27:55 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9596F16005F for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 21:27:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1617391666; bh=jrzcVumpaGNZb6ozJRzYRGSHUBLAahVCtuw8KgyT218=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:From; b=U0x53Lbki4ZvqY+iuTNwLr3+Cq7VzfLO1hfCm1kHBygb6CHQd3JyVdTREFRh1HD0N TbDhnaklbaMzqSXsDdxupgQMohHOXLtwIgGZg79TPLXOH9idj3Iy7GDt+yt1ZbSY08 zb4Fcp0KLqfziSSObGGl6ZNqdQi79awoq+kwffoXt8z/xUPdGBR9DQWuTFaW60CqSM hXXKLd0trjZrNXLur7xtVgWrU2UHUHsNoxm49L3gv3lUKoTJAUo9RNQkvPu3ZSjDPk /hTmxre00QQXdBHMY6jQSKXObUNcrNv0bQnPhVJTKbMO6eKpkLPO3VixMT0K6iXMJN sYgt8WieJ/czg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4FBqns65rZz6tm5; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 21:27:45 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=d.williams@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267310 Archived-At: > I think that would encourage people not to sign copyright paperwork. I would argue that anyone swayed by the presence of an alternative not involving paperwork currently uses MELPA instead. I don't think the risk of that would be increased by any number of additional alternatives in that case. If I am not mistaken this would only leave the projects made by people that (for whatever reason) do not wish to sign copyright paperwork as a potential gain.