From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bill Wohler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rationale for split-string? Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 20:11:51 -0700 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <7078.1053400311@newt.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1053400278 20039 80.91.224.249 (20 May 2003 03:11:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 03:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue May 20 05:11:15 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19HxWr-0005Cx-00 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 05:11:05 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19Hxgx-0004rL-00 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 05:21:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19HxYB-0003iA-8J for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 19 May 2003 23:12:27 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19HxXm-0003hM-OA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 May 2003 23:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19HxXl-0003h2-HY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 May 2003 23:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from adsl-63-202-22-248.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([63.202.22.248] helo=olgas.newt.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19HxXg-0003fm-9F; Mon, 19 May 2003 23:11:56 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=newt.com ident=wohler) by olgas.newt.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19HxXb-0001qB-00; Mon, 19 May 2003 20:11:51 -0700 Original-To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" X-Mailer: MH-E 7.3+cvs; nmh 1.0.4+dev; GNU Emacs 21.2.1 X-Face: "5k'?Iz]8K@!MNcM~N?&Uw3~UkuQ+b^{)ecyVaJlgKxZsT76xpl+W$/c9RtY/Y6sz>Gg)!b>}74-9nWJC&ajPue}*aD@s"?sQ6;P]M|q1^@We1p_T(A.u[0>+]Ez|;`.biir|K7$UQS=8rxc)`O^~DJs-a7p7XENI_7c]
  • List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14011 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14011 "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > A few I couldn't tell at all without doing a much deeper analysis of > the code than I have time for right now: > > ./lisp/calendar/todo-mode.el:869: needs checking > ./lisp/eshell/em-pred.el:601: needs checking > ./lisp/mh-e/mh-utils.el:1606: needs checking Thanks very much for checking. I believe that Satyaki has already fixed this in CVS MH-E so that it would be compatible with present and future versions of Emacs as well as XEmacs. Given our recent history, this should find its way into CVS Emacs in a few weeks (in MH-E 7.4). > ./lisp/mh-e/mh-alias.el:156: want OMIT-NULLS t > ./lisp/mh-e/mh-alias.el:289: OK > ./lisp/mh-e/mh-alias.el:469: OK > ./lisp/mh-e/mh-comp.el:374: OK, double default > ./lisp/mh-e/mh-e.el:2164: OK, double default > ./lisp/mh-e/mh-index.el:475: OK, double default > ./lisp/mh-e/mh-seq.el:966: OK, double default > ./lisp/mh-e/mh-utils.el:1606: needs checking -- Bill Wohler http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.