From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Carsten Dominik Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: recent changes to org files Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:33:20 +0200 Message-ID: <706A2EBD-5FD7-455D-B614-72780B866D7A@gmail.com> References: <8D11CC21-71C6-4BCE-ACBC-090E429E311A@science.uva.nl> <86k5pe6t4e.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <1100BA17-7426-4C73-9EF0-FF90C1859B47@gmail.com> <86bqaq6pza.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193196845 26978 80.91.229.12 (24 Oct 2007 03:34:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: johnw@newartisans.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rgm@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 24 05:34:06 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IkX0O-0001VZ-Ip for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:34:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkX0G-0008Qx-Cv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IkX0C-0008Qq-AR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:33:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IkX09-0008Qe-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:33:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkX09-0008Qb-Mi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:33:49 -0400 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IkX09-00068W-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:33:49 -0400 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so281983ugf for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:33:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=Uevc2tITHbjJXjqRbznolduvGhxcsJQuZTPE2KmLZ+A=; b=dNxyq7ABoqrQna+SSCwhPeSLks5crnfb0GIctm/4dd6b3SBKqrj4g8YoOy0RBkHNAKCLDV21y1SiZq1FaLavVo9FFtcH0tei1oScE/HZ3nkr+65+fX7cEe/Y0s+OkSmWm5UomEarnvdYSLkbOZwkp0QW4HWLbYjQFZaKyUTwfIM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=dTSmW1kDJkDtFMYwxArqZUpnuEAdT2MjaaeOAxlXddn5xrf/0++0IX3Cv2N9DtzyUHcxdwU319sk6keXdGn5BP7f2SURkt0FIeB4picQXAGiiFZbAVwB5GKn/QeAn+3uRsBg2SLIR6WcMnrGIM7VbgjW7IZp4bTHP/hXkxC1q28= Original-Received: by 10.66.224.19 with SMTP id w19mr1593038ugg.1193196827973; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:33:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?192.168.2.2? ( [81.71.213.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z34sm285667ikz.2007.10.23.20.33.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:33:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81615 Archived-At: On Oct 24, 2007, at 4:50 AM, Richard Stallman wrote: > If calling `next-line' is really correct in org-mode, it ought to be > called inside (with-no-warnings ...) to (1) suppress the compiler > warning and (2) show programmers "yes we really mean this, it wasn't a > dumb mistake". > > Thus, the code that called `next-line' needed to be fixed one way > or another. > If not by changing to `forward-line' then by adding `with-no- > warnings'. > > At the same time, this shows the need to look more closely at a > program > before changing `next-line' to `forward-line'. That change is only > safe > if point is at the beginning of a line. So you need to check that > that is > always so, before making the change. And you need to check if there is invisible text in the buffer!!!!! - Carsten