From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs pretest 25.0.93 Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:46:12 -0400 Message-ID: <6ishycqi2z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87r3dxbln9.fsf@petton.fr> <87bn50pn65.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <834mas5y4i.fsf@gnu.org> <877ffopkzt.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <8737qcpklh.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <8337qc5w01.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb38o3ll.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <83zisk4erk.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb38jqs8.fsf@web.de> <87inz8nu39.fsf@Rainer.invalid> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461437188 11815 80.91.229.3 (23 Apr 2016 18:46:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 18:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 23 20:46:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1au2ZR-0003qo-19 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 20:46:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53249 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1au2ZQ-0004Fi-GK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:46:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54527) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1au2ZN-0004DN-9J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:46:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1au2ZM-0000DJ-J6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:46:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47863) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1au2ZJ-0000CW-Dx; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:46:13 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1au2ZI-0001uq-AM; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:46:12 -0400 X-Spook: pre-emptive SAFE diwn interception Plague M-14 Gangs PGP X-Ran: A\UOuQ]BE4wa{e^`eL61$kvjq]WHc'h3Zvy@,Z`O@f;,]%['G&GKZySyCr:'8{'!f1IBxG X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sat, 23 Apr 2016 13:39:10 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203227 Archived-At: Anyway, sounds like using a dummy timestamp like (0 0 0 0) instead of t might be better.