From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Antoine Levitt" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: An Emacs plug-in for a browser (Firefox?) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 13:20:39 +0200 Message-ID: <6fa54e4e0809050420i5132ace5red5a011b69ecd1ed@mail.gmail.com> References: <18624.40059.414121.633475@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <48C0BB3A.4080201@pajato.com> <87zlmnezy9.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> <48C0FC53.4020806@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_60645_5263016.1220613639801" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220613657 3536 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2008 11:20:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Michael Reilly , raman@users.sourceforge.net, Phil Jackson , joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 05 13:21:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KbZNu-0001zl-Lk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:21:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52368 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KbZMu-0007oL-VC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:20:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KbZMp-0007lH-0c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:20:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KbZMn-0007j5-Cm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:20:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47803 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KbZMn-0007iu-3T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:20:41 -0400 Original-Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.147]:42071) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KbZMn-0007Nz-AQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:20:41 -0400 Original-Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so194648eyg.24 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 04:20:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=Fcm56wtEPtZSWBUlIozVJ1C2xqB1dqHgJ2ZMTTNlFQQ=; b=DDbDTX8T1Ao8kRdYZzuZhlvHmuuUVlIMW9i5UGhErgB9wARvedwFuHAPS5gY5Z3Tql FWuLfQkSJcwelJFc6uyEiEbwkQseBvOx97iIHHIjmq8I6uo459ocRWC+5bMLvXn5f+m0 EgykUR4C/k/qG1NLXl8NCbCWU42eOam2eGDyY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=EkVwAwL8/B6cp/A6mV+CrYe00XgvGTlRBxAzlS15jnUjUYyDvok29d7rcx2/t06/K3 E3eHZG1zUvUS4rJPftumAk8UAdojqCOvZb4ukZE55FaLvCxnCStP9eIFBXyoqSndStlw upJPHKmZFSp3WVE2GWJido1PXcQaQ/7zkY0QQ= Original-Received: by 10.210.80.17 with SMTP id d17mr13575743ebb.67.1220613639799; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 04:20:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.210.141.18 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 04:20:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48C0FC53.4020806@gmail.com> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103557 Archived-At: ------=_Part_60645_5263016.1220613639801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I fully agree with Paul Reilly and T.V. Raman. I think the last brick that is remaining to make emacs a full-featured modern desktop is a web browser (I'm not talking about w3m) I have successfully merged yesterday all that remained of my desktop environment into emacs : IRC and IM. Now, my time is shared among exclusively emacs and firefox, and the next logical step would be merging both. What I think would be the ultimate desktop environment would be a way to have emacs buffers which are web tabs, with a web major mode. It would use two keyboard maps : one for web surfing, which would we similar to what conkeror uses, and one for input, which would be the standard one (plus maybe keys to get out of the input box). I have absolutely no idea of how feasible this is, but when I saw chrome announcement, first thing that came to my mind is "hey, these guys start from scratch with a clean API, it may be easier to wrap into emacs". I hope that some talented hacker (ie not me) start a project to do this integration. I'd be happy to help, and I suspect many others too. 2008/9/5 Lennart Borgman (gmail) > joakim@verona.se wrote: > > I suppose like the existing emacs/mozilla integration, which I forget > > the name of, that just pipes js through some sort of port to mozilla and > > MozRepl? > > > ------=_Part_60645_5263016.1220613639801 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
I fully agree with Paul Reilly and T.V. Raman. I th= ink the last brick that is remaining to make emacs a full-featured modern d= esktop is a web browser (I'm not talking about w3m)
 I have suc= cessfully merged yesterday all that remained of my desktop environment into= emacs : IRC and IM. Now, my time is shared among exclusively emacs and fir= efox, and the next logical step would be merging both. What I think would b= e the ultimate desktop environment would be a way to have emacs buffers whi= ch are web tabs, with a web major mode. It would use two keyboard maps : on= e for web surfing, which would we similar to what conkeror uses, and one fo= r input, which would be the standard one (plus maybe keys to get out of the= input box). I have absolutely no idea of how feasible this is, but when I = saw chrome announcement, first thing that came to my mind is "hey, the= se guys start from scratch with a clean API, it may be easier to wrap into = emacs". I hope that some talented hacker (ie not me) start a project t= o do this integration. I'd be happy to help, and I suspect many others = too.
2008/9/5 Lennart Borgman (gmail) <lennart.borgman@gmail.c= om>
joakim@verona.se<= /a> wrote:
> I suppose like the existing emacs/mozilla integration, which I forget<= br> > the name of, that just pipes js through some sort of port to mozilla a= nd

MozRepl?



------=_Part_60645_5263016.1220613639801--