From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John ff Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master updated (31e8500b061 -> 04e8ad6489e) Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 20:25:53 +0100 Message-ID: <6f76e0d9-a664-4c7f-8f3f-981c17e72dae@codemist.co.uk> References: <172616480089.7302.12250649684752047951@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <878qvwkluq.fsf@gmail.com> <86mskbkeqs.fsf@gnu.org> <874j6jlpqn.fsf@gmail.com> <87zfobk9wb.fsf@gmail.com> <86frq3k79j.fsf@gnu.org> <87v7yzk6as.fsf@gmail.com> <86bk0rk3w8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4100"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Android Cc: Robert Pluim ,emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 18 21:31:07 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sr0OJ-0000tR-DN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 21:31:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sr0L4-0004FE-Ux; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:27:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sr0Kx-0003t6-UR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:27:40 -0400 Original-Received: from codemist.co.uk ([217.155.197.248]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sr0Kw-0007pc-F2; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [172.16.4.29] by codemist.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1sr0KK-000000003Fg-0D54; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 20:27:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86bk0rk3w8.fsf@gnu.org> X-Referenced-Uid: 396529 Thread-Topic: Re: master updated (31e8500b061 -> 04e8ad6489e) X-Is-Generated-Message-Id: true X-ACL-Warn: No reverse lookup Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.155.197.248; envelope-from=jpff@codemist.co.uk; helo=codemist.co.uk X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323735 Archived-At: =E2=81=A3=3D=3DJohn ffitch =E2=80=8B -------- Original Message --------= From: Eli Zaretskii Sent: Fri Sep 13 15:46:31 GMT+01:00 2= 024 To: Robert Pluim Cc: emacs-devel@gnu=2Eorg Subject= : Re: master updated (31e8500b061 -> 04e8ad6489e) > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu=2Eorg > Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 15:54:35 +0200 >=20 > >>>>> On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 16:33:44 +0300, Eli Zaretskii = said: >=20 > >> From: Robert Pluim > >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu=2Eorg > >> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:36:52 +0200 > >>=20 > >> >>>>> On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:09:20 +0200, Robert Pluim said: > >>=20 > >> BTW, is it worth updating admin/unicode/README? I can do that=2E >=20 > Eli> I guess so, but please either make it so the file doesn't need = to be > Eli> updated each time we import a new Unicode version, or if that i= s > Eli> impossible, add to admin/notes/unicode some verbiage to the eff= ect > Eli> that README should be updated=2E >=20 > I can make the URLs point to the latest version of the files easily > enough, but it also contains the dates of those files=2E All of them > with the exception of UnicodeData=2Etxt have comments in them containing > those dates anyway, so I think we can just remove the dates from > README=2E Yes, I agree=2E