From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "CHENG Gao" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs version number (trunk build) problem Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:41:22 +0800 Message-ID: <6de468cd0803210341s37118ea1xb686d1c371b1d535@mail.gmail.com> References: <874pb0jwb7.fsf@news.cyberhut.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2417_9222425.1206096082967" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206102125 25719 80.91.229.12 (21 Mar 2008 12:22:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Andreas Schwab" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 21 13:22:35 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JcgGV-0004cO-8P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:22:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JcgFu-0004BU-Ks for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:21:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jcegm-0007TO-Um for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:41:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jcegg-0007Nb-2E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:41:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jcegf-0007NL-HG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:41:25 -0400 Original-Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.224]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jcegf-0005JY-FA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:41:25 -0400 Original-Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 57so1442225wri.12 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:41:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=b7ugYH+bSdbE1j7UeXRp6/vcMFEefNpeb7s0bil9HKg=; b=Uc0uPVJhZF0KcqsVMwkdR2OcZr0wRYKLZINth/pBUHR82tRDo2tjNoJKbAzh7zKOB6+dCxuUAYZSfYLMT5yb1RD/G3RaIXM5LZP0o2uf46iiG7t57gEfgr9RIqSPN1FpVHjQhPDhYNi3QcaJWqCAiG89n9g9OCWZlQh3vXH94Gs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=K4O1y70p+XDnBrd0adjJvnLFxMWU4yap4AA/EqBye5m2C3ir4C7ZDcDzwS1G9HXbChujUpL4JBs3q6T+1hEiDzz83fQK4tkMe6MHnblXsX4kSvcoeBzdCVf6k/2gZnh0hNa/uQ7ux0s/dqDJLdFyXZKbuyZpgoclCgKGvAvUCw0= Original-Received: by 10.151.157.8 with SMTP id j8mr1459242ybo.86.1206096082995; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.150.49.14 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:41:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:21:51 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:93111 Archived-At: ------=_Part_2417_9222425.1206096082967 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline My memory may be corrupted, but if not, I think build number starts from 1 and increases by 1, and what I found with the latest source is that the 1st build got number 23.0.60.2 & the 2nd build 23.0.60.4 that is what I think weird. MFG, On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > CHENG Gao writes: > > > I found a weird problem with my Emacs build (from trunk). > > I grabbed fresh Emacs source with cvs, and the first build got number > > 23.0.60.2, and several days later I built again after "cvs update", and > > the version number became 23.0.60.4. > > > > Is this deliberate or is there a bug? > > This is how the Emacs buildsystem works since more than 14 years. The > build number is incremented whenever Emacs is dumped, based on which > executable files exit in the build directory. > > Andreas. > > -- > Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de > SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany > PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 > "And now for something completely different." > ------=_Part_2417_9222425.1206096082967 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline My memory may be corrupted, but if not, I think build number starts from 1 = and increases by 1, and what I found with the latest source is that

= the 1st build got number 23.0.60.2
&= ;
the 2nd build 23.0.60.4

that is wha= t I think weird.

MFG,


On Fri, = Mar 21, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
CHENG Gao <chenggao@gmail.com> writes:

> I found a weird problem with my Emacs build (from trunk).
> I grabbed fresh Emacs source with cvs, and the first build got number<= br> > 23.0.60.2, and seve= ral days later I built again after "cvs update", and
> the version number became 23.0.60.4.
>
> Is this deliberate or is there a bug?

This is how the Emacs buildsystem works since more than 14 years.  The=
build number is incremented whenever Emacs is dumped, based on which
executable files exit in the build directory.

Andreas.

--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de=
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 = 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

------=_Part_2417_9222425.1206096082967--