From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 16:50:23 +0200 Message-ID: <6d9c2238-0942-3084-57b6-ab94b5e9a907@yandex.ru> References: <1552789070.5272.1@yandex.ru> <1552791707.5272.2@yandex.ru> <1552793646.5272.3@yandex.ru> <1552821396.21432.0@yandex.ru> <83imwhwf4x.fsf@gnu.org> <837ecvux2q.fsf@gnu.org> <9c7cf558-a2d3-951e-d6e1-31b3ad5900cf@yandex.ru> <1553248918.28810.1@yandex.ru> <8336nfrq50.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhpnq8ka.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="137005"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 22 15:50:56 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h7LVX-000ZXX-MO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:50:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58552 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7LVW-0006Vp-PJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7LV7-0006Fm-PP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:50:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7LV6-0000hM-Bh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:50:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x442.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::442]:37863) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7LV5-0000fs-Ol; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:50:28 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x442.google.com with SMTP id w10so2688015wrm.4; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 07:50:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E8KYyEJWQI5Ru5SoFcLYbAiEc9ikVpI3Bri1ap/79lU=; b=kmstCDKDqf5l6Ef1Vhu1GnkWJV9cGXM33R8jCf6wbvJ6VfD9K+a1zKCnq/8ruxmmr2 cmzM7tmeccsAXPVSGW2jWD1la9xhj+UAGTyD/uzwMqdT+amKNO+5tMcLQLLcqAUnU7Ns HzWQAuLrgu2u88Xbd9GPGR/2nPqQYqifIGPWFxy1SRuAx9xdGSyXAvUGe2keYNmMfPxl 1OxRX9/sODi+MCFtr3T5+VhaswjEepurSTdor0HH89FX5ucIBA14dIqWBlbO9zbm+2jm 5YxzVRxSO6rUgQCHWIEq69GMmb96Xgv4mSbCbked8XXWfAgpYusKx5sjaDLqI26cNMUR EQCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=E8KYyEJWQI5Ru5SoFcLYbAiEc9ikVpI3Bri1ap/79lU=; b=tm67MKu/d5HvvSSnbbgzzqLH8G+gNHrxW4HtUa62DP+mfG5+hEWPPA3f0FkfO30i4h 84vxw60y2NNLeoIVQGgvW8nhYyVR4w3SdwuAIBf7t+35bcHoAjH6ZNEJhBj4gEV8l6KQ SCw4y37zVjUhSYiOI/wyGHislm73FkJcqIL945X7RAWVlXCZ7YrjlGFfMIBQG3ze7u5k NIpLDslXYHjTd0L33ItAbNFgtgzqcnRZDPwMsF35JMrXePnUjiDaMx4KX+EfKGAAQET+ ILBFIOAPNddPLX0FiW7uH/cVR+C9Sqfo8JadzUDE0Z/k728XFTDzQxR+81/XZTBKqYB3 dM0w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVTHZVlKHNqyvXlzcikL+0e6k/nsAYRkPwsEuuNnN6iDJO4Kpcw EX774PEQXK+JOoyCdbH7TmH3y0Xu X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxgDDxRxGgcErMTnfHHgVpJ19vb8Bo3KW9YxZtx/a/DCPF7vsRQ7XHP0X1w3gOCdgatoQ2Dfw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:db05:: with SMTP id s5mr5875044wri.247.1553266226034; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 07:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.195] ([109.110.245.170]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z8sm8263782wrh.80.2019.03.22.07.50.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 07:50:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83zhpnq8ka.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::442 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:234580 Archived-At: On 22.03.2019 16:37, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > That sounds like filtering would be a better solution than separation > into two mailing lists. Doesn't debbugs inject some header into > messages with a patch? If not, perhaps it should. How would it differentiate simple bug reports from bug reports with inline patches, for example? And if you're talking about somebody doing the tagging manually post-factum, that won't work great because the original email was already filtered out by whatever system Stefan could set up. I don't really see how you could make it work well with an email-based workflow without a separate mailing list or similar.