From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jared Finder via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Mouse-hovering over 'mouse-face' overlays/regions on a TTY Emacs Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 21:31:59 -0800 Message-ID: <6d7d75bbad978a2eb8a80a7c90a33040@finder.org> References: <838sajle0s.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9dmker4.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7p6kd74.fsf@gnu.org> <837dq2k8ik.fsf@gnu.org> <87eekag0n3.fsf@gmail.com> <83zh2yisdt.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8jdgzgk.fsf@gnu.org> <5aff1d6ff795552203292395560a5075@finder.org> <83blf8cz9l.fsf@gnu.org> <91a58d2052f11b5f01a6ce41ebe93380@finder.org> Reply-To: Jared Finder Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22982"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.16 Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 16 06:33:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l0eCy-0005rj-8p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 06:33:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60146 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0eCx-0008JM-9b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 00:33:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43466) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0eBy-0007sR-EL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 00:32:06 -0500 Original-Received: from greenhill.hpalace.com ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe73:2daa]:33428) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0eBw-0000p7-Rg; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 00:32:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.finder.org (greenhill.hpalace.com [IPv6:2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe73:2daa]) by greenhill.hpalace.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FD4864B; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 05:32:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=finder.org; s=2018; t=1610775120; bh=tPVGAh8hmHrAZHrGt1lr0l2Qfei0TECL+NF4oNFEIM8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=0Gysc1oPHaH3IvQNTWJjl29mcUkyNDcUzo9ClejIJ8cAKZ1xSOlNpAxDNfnpEXArW bf3uwofOz2PUYsvWN+hqslpUoLZoDmNeaNOxiXBpUsaRiRHJQVHG2xCXmV78xgYfV4 B5m1TUBV/y0r/a2UpjAEEYIxjJxXlExCDVenWVPdcNVHdguzfogLsr9R9kfSldAGMH P/CdE2rYyz6Xd/J4K4RVAqfwMrhrv5VSXebC0irEeoGAvl9Bl+b0IvmSJfgnvayy6g Fxa9yvRPV8Oq7gNkQEAuGb8L+hmn8dimIgWXiPJZxoB7fuYiLCYGoQEwBxxGbpqX0W m3mweLMmFXpPQ== In-Reply-To: <91a58d2052f11b5f01a6ce41ebe93380@finder.org> X-Sender: jared@finder.org Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe73:2daa; envelope-from=jared@finder.org; helo=greenhill.hpalace.com X-Spam_score_int: 16 X-Spam_score: 1.6 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RCVD_IN_XBL=0.375, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263089 Archived-At: It seems like these set of patches got lost. Joao, Eli, is this no longer valuable? -- MJF On 2020-12-07 9:46 pm, Jared Finder wrote: > On 2020-12-05 2:39 am, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 00:40:01 -0800 >>> From: Jared Finder >>> Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org >>> >>> * src/frame.c (Fset_mouse_position, Fset_mouse_pixel_position): Call >>> Fselect_frame in all terminals, independent of defines. >> >> Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how the proposed changes >> cause Fselect_frame to be called fore any display type. > > Perhaps I'm using the wrong terminology? It causes Fselect_frame to > be called for all terminals, a.k.a *non-graphical* displays, a.k.a. > the display you get when you specify -nw. > > Other comments addressed, patch attached. > > -- MJF