From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christophe Poncy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:17:42 +0200 Message-ID: <6d566edf88c66f315a3e46ddb44175b4@canaxis.org> References: <87k42cwys8.fsf@gnu.org> <87limhuldm.fsf@gnu.org> <871uo7g4j6.fsf@gnu.org> <87iphjhbm8.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87398lgrat.fsf_-_@niu.edu> <871uo5c7r0.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87pqbpj5j3.fsf@altern.org> <87aa2szgig.fsf@gnu.org> <87ehs4yrhz.fsf@gnu.org> <83k41vctyg.fsf@gnu.org> <83aa2rcnww.fsf@gnu.org> <8362dedgcb.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkapi7qe.fsf@gnu.org> <83iphdb6dp.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: cp@canaxis.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1333729153 9519 80.91.229.3 (6 Apr 2012 16:19:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 16:19:13 +0000 (UTC) To: Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 06 18:19:12 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SGBsW-0002pb-Av for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:19:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47748 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SGBsV-0004SG-GB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:19:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40738) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SGBrA-0000rY-66 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:17:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SGBr7-0000V0-Ij for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:17:47 -0400 Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:53395) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SGBr7-0000U1-BK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:17:45 -0400 X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-Originating-IP: 10.58.1.143 X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay Original-Received: from webmail.gandi.net (webmail3-d.mgt.gandi.net [10.58.1.143]) (Authenticated sender: cp@canaxis.org) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1ADAB172087 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 18:17:43 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <83iphdb6dp.fsf@gnu.org> X-Sender: cp@canaxis.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5.4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 217.70.183.196 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149429 Archived-At: On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:40:18 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Bastien >> Cc: Stefan Monnier , eliz@gnu.org, >> emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 10:29:13 +0200 >> >> Regular Org testers don't want to rebuild Emacs each time they have >> to test a new feature in Org. > > Why would they need to do that? Org is not preloaded into Emacs, so > all you need is compile the new Org files and perhaps restart the > Emacs session, but not rebuild Emacs. It's so easy and convenient to get their latest development release from their git repo. I must confess that I like this way to stay up to date. I would love to do the same with emacs ;)