From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Preview: portable dumper Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 09:59:35 -0800 Message-ID: <6cc4f02c-1fcd-8982-a3ed-130bf510dec8@dancol.org> References: <87r2pfsjm7.fsf@gmail.com> <21ee28b4-c3cd-4664-a501-8df6b78d3e48@email.android.com> <87zi43h8i6.fsf@gmail.com> <87vaerh7wy.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1519149532 30861 195.159.176.226 (20 Feb 2018 17:58:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:58:52 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 20 18:58:48 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCBj-0007dD-Az for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:58:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56930 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCDl-0006Vc-Lw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:00:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52401) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCCe-0006TR-0c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 12:59:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCCd-0007ly-7p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 12:59:44 -0500 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:34430) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCCc-0007kX-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 12:59:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject; bh=/k2BsZbHJq2M/fAXZFK6VJUjZqPiPcy86n3vLmacWGw=; b=hLbVnficRwTTtSelqQwu4Him+spF9qmnh3gZ5fnXsMviOSHb32zA1p08OIqf7JqlSBYPobgJNHGjF1bGftRr5W7BrhCTVzv0OQ9rnaU5qhlfr52FJZQpMOeDFleDL7jQbzbhOql9BfSOdxyFUU3DnYzVhPRZ2yMcnK0i0oB452TIk18zlDw/Ddj9jHNGbHNNIeJ9WtbeutL0VZLjCo/2EUhE4J9cvKQRQzAbH7Ul7Rw1AtPL2JgsfbXmKw6iznVnq07SYNE9Qg8iocAoAV0EygKwbIfC17ElOopaoMIEbe4ydtnnh36/HjEaxTbtcZ3YBp4zn6TeoPBYqopwzOG2yA==; Original-Received: from [2604:4080:1321:8ab0:e568:87d3:fce4:c549] by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCCb-0007GU-TU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 09:59:41 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87vaerh7wy.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:222934 Archived-At: On 02/20/2018 09:45 AM, Robert Pluim wrote: > Robert Pluim writes: > >>> Do you get an assertion failure if you enable assertion checking? If we're seeing this kind of problem from the compiler expectation alone, I'll definitely revert that change. >> >> No, --enable-checking=all gets me a different segfault: > > And in fact I get that segfault even with > fca8372020248318f1d0007378607a912b19026e reverted, but only with > --enable-checking=all Can you repro with an -O0 build?