From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
To: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2017 22:54:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ae6864b-3bb9-2e7d-c050-2d26894268a5@cs.ucla.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAArVCkRJ28ESQyCfMM9aS+bfRojiErwueNXmYak=R0kYBbBr5g@mail.gmail.com>
Philipp Stephani wrote:
> I don't understand why minimizing the number of checks and assertions
> should be a worthwhile goal. At the very least, the assertions document the
> assumptions that we make about the values, and as such they are valuable
> even if they never trigger.
One can take the process too far. To take a deliberately extreme example,
'eassert (INT_MIN < 0)' would clutter the code unnecessarily, and would be
discarded by the compiler anyway. Although none of the assertions in question
were *that* obvious, some did have that flavor (and indeed, were optimized away
by GCC). The patch that I proposed eliminated those, while retaining the ones
that conveyed useful and nonobvious information. Admittedly some of the removals
were judgment calls; however, the point remains that easserts should not waste
the reader's time unnecessarily.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-09 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-16 15:54 JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance Ted Zlatanov
2017-09-16 16:02 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-09-17 0:02 ` Richard Stallman
2017-09-17 3:13 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-09-18 0:00 ` Richard Stallman
2017-09-17 0:02 ` Richard Stallman
2017-09-18 13:46 ` Ted Zlatanov
2017-09-17 18:46 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-09-17 19:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-17 20:27 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-09-17 22:41 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-09-18 13:53 ` Ted Zlatanov
2017-09-17 21:17 ` Speed of Elisp (was: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance) Stefan Monnier
2017-09-18 13:26 ` JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance Philipp Stephani
2017-09-18 13:58 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-09-18 14:14 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-09-18 14:28 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-09-18 14:36 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-09-18 15:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-18 16:14 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-09-18 17:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-18 19:57 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2017-09-18 14:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-18 15:07 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-09-18 15:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-18 16:22 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-09-18 18:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-19 19:32 ` Richard Stallman
2017-09-18 17:26 ` Glenn Morris
2017-09-18 18:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-18 16:08 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-09-19 8:18 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-09-19 19:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-28 21:19 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-09-28 21:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-29 19:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-30 22:02 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-10-01 18:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-03 12:26 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-10-03 15:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-03 15:52 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-10-03 16:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-03 17:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-03 18:37 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-10-03 20:52 ` Paul Eggert
2017-10-04 5:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-04 6:41 ` Paul Eggert
2017-10-04 8:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-04 17:51 ` Paul Eggert
2017-10-04 19:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-04 21:24 ` Paul Eggert
2017-10-05 1:48 ` Paul Eggert
2017-10-05 7:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-08 22:52 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-10-09 5:54 ` Paul Eggert [this message]
2017-10-29 20:48 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-10-09 6:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-05 7:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-06 1:58 ` Paul Eggert
2017-10-06 7:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-06 19:36 ` Paul Eggert
2017-10-06 21:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-08 23:09 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-10-09 6:19 ` Paul Eggert
2017-10-29 20:48 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-10-29 22:49 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-12-09 23:05 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-12-10 7:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-12-10 13:26 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-12-10 13:32 ` Ted Zlatanov
2017-10-08 23:04 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-10-09 6:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-08 17:58 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-10-08 18:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-08 23:14 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-10-09 6:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-29 20:41 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-10-09 6:22 ` Paul Eggert
2017-10-01 18:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-03 12:12 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-10-03 14:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ae6864b-3bb9-2e7d-c050-2d26894268a5@cs.ucla.edu \
--to=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=p.stephani2@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).