From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Time to merge scratch/correct-warning-pos into master, perhaps? Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 21:16:58 +0000 Message-ID: <6a5bb5a08ba8e2a3f393@heytings.org> References: <837darmygd.fsf@gnu.org> <58bb8030d59733b52b8d@heytings.org> <83r18zkmd5.fsf@gnu.org> <835yq9ls7j.fsf@gnu.org> <058b682b11240176288f@heytings.org> <83h79tjd2f.fsf@gnu.org> <058b682b11f58780b580@heytings.org> <83v8y8ij39.fsf@gnu.org> <6a5bb5a08b3d764611f9@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23905"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, Eli Zaretskii , larsi@gnus.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 25 22:19:12 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nCTDa-00061t-W1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:19:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56380 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCTDZ-0006RM-Us for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:19:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCTBb-0004ya-RJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:17:07 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:41654) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCTBZ-0003ln-9A; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:17:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1643145418; bh=DNQ8Q3M5hknxWyCDh8jcGTxG4ysXuFO+lfi/It3X18E=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=bS8oZw2uWbJQbGZbMEtRibt0jL5LOjGuUUlY67dI0PhdPc86A5HPWfi+BMpWKCTa1 XaYesCuDqJGG9RLUwwX8XKgzdcjvZdo6WHyFqF0qC/hj6CNIRkUJdcc8cxb7VlPf4p jFy2D48pGXtCuWiLBsn+daKcWjP9n/h9RnIEBZlVln+2vfVv+SskTGLG9cO91TVF7K 7mNW4QkcOp5UHv/DUrhXnCliuyE46IUzirFkBmJM+TqFPDRYu8I/kxENlZ9N8c49c6 6TlfI8K2v6qGFS4W1MDqcfV38DoXpRUPFQvmMF7y0VFAUCA6mucD49+ZA/vR5don+E oLsMttnDVjHEQ== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285395 Archived-At: >>> Are there other benchmarks (not micro-benchmarks) that could be used >>> to reach what you would consider a mature conclusion? >> >> There is Andrea Corallo's elisp-benchmark package. > > It's a micro-benchmark, and moreover it is difficult to interpret, its > results on the same (unloaded) machine with the same version of Emacs > vary by +/- 5%. > (And as Mattias said upthread it is not representative of real Elisp usage.)