From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sending bug reports without setting up email Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 08:02:20 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <6a51f3f7-b6e5-94e8-3b6d-0dd2efe345ed@cs.ucla.edu> References: <87twi7jq6z.fsf@gnus.org> <87r3dbhz5x.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462892571 17653 80.91.229.3 (10 May 2016 15:02:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:02:51 +0000 (UTC) To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 10 17:02:42 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b09BJ-0005j9-OK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 17:02:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46750 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b09BI-0007x5-TM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 11:02:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b09B6-0007uO-Ak for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 11:02:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b09B2-0003ui-SX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 11:02:28 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:48905) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b09B2-0003uc-NN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 11:02:24 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5655C16127C; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:02:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id Da9EVvuPHOyC; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:02:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D41161280; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:02:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id JajOdHdvm0GH; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:02:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from penguin.cs.ucla.edu (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36B7416127C; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:02:20 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: <87r3dbhz5x.fsf@gnus.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203769 Archived-At: On 05/09/2016 11:19 AM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > That is, put the check for res_init back again. Would that be OK? It should be OK to put the res_init check back into configure.ac. However, res_init is not thread-safe, and other threads might be doing name resolution. Shouldn't Emacs use res_ninit instead?