From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-28 4c7e74c: Complete shorthands to longhands for symbol-completing tables Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 00:55:14 +0300 Message-ID: <698e605e-52fc-8ab7-dc3b-9f85d88478b9@yandex.ru> References: <20211010133328.31565.61124@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20211010133330.11619209DC@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <7b746a3c-6c07-ea0c-10e5-2a5673222b98@yandex.ru> <9cb96642-0535-4662-7779-ec03bb6ca012@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20836"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Cc: emacs-devel To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 10 23:56:56 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mZgoS-0005DE-7j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 23:56:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60884 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZgoR-0000Jl-4y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 17:56:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56396) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZgmu-0007lG-5F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 17:55:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::130]:42975) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZgms-0008OO-Lq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 17:55:19 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id x27so64982860lfa.9 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 14:55:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oLRh7kbTtTltXesL4nLtj0hwDL64mI1dJGa8Q+EHpyA=; b=VwvbBv0hUuefRcl677ls06k1CB85/A/WGyHkrdmjRCR8WWSbEQnT8kGrJkIEq5n6Pq IXr7tMrvbl1zBaAlcF0g2ScJXZA9Rz6zPWU1gOJMLZRoTpyqmzsMH0q255lImenbesrJ vVLRQCTQBCugovfs5eNJiuWH6P2eDAXSGoQX+rTOBkKfYnqEjMNg82rbRaSj7LILhE09 +IiYYtbLhOQtBx/FK5PdvALCAfgt+JjFBfz+QCLSVy2N1KiBdngv1UuuZrfq/H1tyaO8 635+UrrU50uCc4kXpunC7elmAK0zLZpGSK7u5klRMZaLgTW9TWecNZy+MYHtTdozTjYN 7T5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oLRh7kbTtTltXesL4nLtj0hwDL64mI1dJGa8Q+EHpyA=; b=Z6edyPAjnOIcGfQld3V4bTWno6/WqR3I/Ua4IIl+HwJuEJdMSYgeLsvL1ChnNog7QG 0P+uWLvoHpI82BaqPmQJvtT9DHbTnQ1ZuDeoNwoi0Ia7L5mPw7MTE97LuGG4RU5Bq8Gr Y4769Mp6Yqs/Hu9KYjyi2uTfgWMNKukYn8iWfzKuj/TITO16Zk/sa7KpmGQho5/I4alA D8l3RnSiHhNwDTsbnLf+GDz9ZR9sYDoeaSUb6WoiUMQy5y3+bzToW6g0geRlqMEsrBx6 E5W7Zu9ED3kxgoaI9gpSotP5Dq8UrLfTx82dYXCakh/MWJ6mNhxtri25YJfg8xO5uw2L UvRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325AZnBGXxlU/krm0K4+i8BwzAK6KWDHPryuTx6ysvcwSzlfrIc CxzmH4kime3RXqKQ1dZ9DwOj/i62woI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/LyE+GqBG22J0PY/FmU9tLC5tNNa7o+8pax37KyWMqqbi7lvCjRh4INouJIpHUuJt7uJDig== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:310c:: with SMTP id n12mr1716028lfb.641.1633902916077; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 14:55:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.103] ([5.18.248.29]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m27sm81342lfo.48.2021.10.10.14.55.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Oct 2021 14:55:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::130; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x130.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276708 Archived-At: On 11.10.2021 00:47, João Távora wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 10:45 PM Dmitry Gutov > wrote: > > On 11.10.2021 00:31, João Távora wrote: > > Why don't you state exactly what problematic scenario you're > thinking of? > > People relying on the 'shorthand' style while we try to remove it. > > Presumably, we're going to replace it with something better, so > I don't see any problem. Presumably, we're likely to replace it with no style at all, which can break personal configurations (referencing a non-existent style).