From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dhruva Krishnamurthy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Successful build of emacs-unicode-2 under Windows with MinGW Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:52:56 +0530 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <68c73b1a0409222122155fedf1@mail.gmail.com> References: <876568ontp.fsf@darkhell.com> <68c73b1a0409202237489fef97@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Dhruva Krishnamurthy NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1095913418 2659 80.91.229.6 (23 Sep 2004 04:23:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: chenggao@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 23 06:23:20 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CAL8Z-0005Q0-00 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:23:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CALEa-0007L6-5m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:29:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CALEQ-0007Kq-4E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:29:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CALEO-0007J4-Hn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:29:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CALEO-0007J0-EO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:29:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.170.206] (helo=mproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CAL8D-0006zB-FV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:22:57 -0400 Original-Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 73so2076517rnl for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.38.71.51 with SMTP id t51mr116589rna; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.38.102.20 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27471 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27471 On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:59:30 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > > How important is it to test the emacs-unicode-2 branch at this > > juncture? > > Probably not very. It's more important to test the trunk, as it will be > released much sooner. > > Lots of us are testing the trunk. I think it is important > to have some people regularly using the emacs-unicode-2 branch, > while most test the trunk. > > So if you're regularly using the emacs-unicode-2 branch, > please speak up. > Okay, I tried building the emacs-unicode-2 branch on W2K using both MSVC and MinGW32. It fails in building leim. I therefore did a crude work around by building leim from HEAD and copying it over emacs-unicode and did a build (not bootstrap, just all). I tried copying leim from HEAD on to unicode branch and do make bootstrap, it fails! So, my deduction is that leim build in unicode branch fails atleast for me. By the way, I am using always the latest from emacs head/unicode branches. Also, I am using 'cvs co emacs' and _not_ 'cvs co -kb emacs'. Can this cause some problems by adding CRLF endings.... This should not happen as it does not affect the CVS Head version of Emacs. -dhruva -- Proud FSF member: #1935 http://schemer.fateback.com/