From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs is not reproducible Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 14:24:01 +0200 Message-ID: <68D4CF9A-C5F9-4665-9306-A6D0A6258260@acm.org> References: <87lf8dcrcd.fsf@disroot.org> <15pmxh100n.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21954"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Glenn Morris , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 27 15:19:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lmFuq-0005Vo-Tb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 May 2021 15:19:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34392 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmFuk-0007k6-Qa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 May 2021 09:19:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmFKf-0002Jm-Nr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2021 08:41:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail1479c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.14.79]:55272 helo=mail118c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmFKb-000122-6o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2021 08:41:47 -0400 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1622118244; bh=l1HiCouFcs07i+SB7Jr5Yc4HIZLd2YWumZ9J1iwf6ts=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=fqt9LNd/Fx9tgHMvcskKPclBgAv1DmluVM5/QZ4pTGiUWrY1RU4+6osk1iL4ftK+d mvbi7hBGYE8yhz2QpXH2cAxfvR5P/FlYvZkFLIK783E/mIfXmOTd6AICgNtqg6cLP9 ZNtaIa7pyhU3rjJNfB7SeDElMEQzyjBSqQOf0VJ0= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from stanniol.lan (c-b952e353.032-75-73746f71.bbcust.telenor.se [83.227.82.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail118c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 14RCO2us001259; Thu, 27 May 2021 12:24:03 +0000 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A742F18.60AF8F64.0039, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=Ro+70xuK c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=von4qPfY+hyqc0zmWf0tYQ==:117 a=von4qPfY+hyqc0zmWf0tYQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=M51BFTxLslgA:10 a=iRZporoAAAAA:8 a=eM88qzclRyWIo0c-TKsA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=NOBgFS-JBQ2l-kSd6-zu:22 X-Origin-Country: SE Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=91.136.14.79; envelope-from=mattiase@acm.org; helo=mail118c50.megamailservers.eu X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269942 Archived-At: 26 maj 2021 kl. 22.58 skrev Stefan Monnier : > Matthias, could you try and see where byte-opt.el should let-bind > `byte-optimize--lexvars` to nil to avoid this problem? > I guess we could add it to `byte-compile-top-level`, but it would be > better if we could do it somewhere in `byte-opt.el`. Oh dear, I can't really find any good place to bind the variable either, = but ended up doing it in `byte-compile-inline-expand` on the grounds = that it's the only place we re-enter the compiler from the optimiser. It would probably be better if we had a single entry for = `byte-optimize-form` that wasn't used recursively; then it could be done = there. Anyway, feel free to improve. Writing the test was what took most of the = time anyway!