From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ChangeLog dates Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:02:36 -0500 Message-ID: <67wq6dsrkz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <21622.54248.721592.407612@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <83ioi0oc6a.fsf@gnu.org> <87a93c5fgt.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83lhmvn2qi.fsf@gnu.org> <87oarr4mg9.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83d287mvn5.fsf@gnu.org> <87fvd34ecq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83bnnrmncc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417291391 6968 80.91.229.3 (29 Nov 2014 20:03:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 20:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 29 21:03:05 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XuoES-0002vZ-GV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 21:03:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48707 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XuoES-0005hR-5K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:03:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48105) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XuoE2-0005P1-T2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:02:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XuoE2-0006aw-0D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:02:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46129) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XuoE1-0006ao-TB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:02:37 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XuoE0-0002aW-Nz; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:02:36 -0500 X-Spook: subversive red noise Agfa cybercash PLO SWAT Glock PGP X-Ran: 8R*7_{3*J!nV3BB}-q.JScJKGh,DJMKH{mCw_^J}U)'~4?x7"~> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:178483 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I'm talking about ChangeLog files looked at by people who have only > the release tarball (which is why we produce ChangeLog files). They > don't have Git, they have just the ChangeLog files, and those > ChangeLog files should IMO reflect the ordered sequence of commits to > the branch from which the tarball was created. I agree, and AFAICS, this is the only interpretation that makes any sense. So the ChangeLog date of merged entries simply has to be adjusted to the merge date. This is how we've always done it, and there's no reason it should change because the VCS changed, or if ChangeLog entries were not hand-written.