From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Raeburn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some OpenWrt port related problems Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 23:08:09 -0500 Message-ID: <66798668-5808-473B-BF11-DF4DBA5464A1@raeburn.org> References: <87sjxi5hko.fsf@snail.Pool> <87lj39y52n.fsf@snail.Pool> <87pqsl7wt7.fsf@snail.Pool> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293682104 11868 80.91.229.12 (30 Dec 2010 04:08:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 04:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Dev To: David Kuehling Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 30 05:08:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PY9oJ-0003Fd-LE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 05:08:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47158 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PY9oJ-0007u2-CM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 23:08:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35538 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PY9oF-0007tv-1v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 23:08:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PY9oD-0005si-Pa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 23:08:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:49520) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PY9oD-0005sZ-LG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 23:08:13 -0500 Original-Received: by qwa26 with SMTP id 26so10513311qwa.0 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 20:08:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.224.54.129 with SMTP id q1mr15112265qag.79.1293682092634; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 20:08:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from squish.raeburn.org (c-24-128-190-224.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.128.190.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nb15sm8032988qcb.2.2010.12.29.20.08.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 29 Dec 2010 20:08:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87pqsl7wt7.fsf@snail.Pool> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134042 Archived-At: On Dec 29, 2010, at 04:28, David Kuehling wrote: >>>>>> "Richard" =3D=3D Richard Stallman writes: >=20 >> Why do you want to avoid dumping? >=20 > Because OpenWrt is using cross-compilation for everything. I.e. the > system used for compilation is usually an x86 system, but the = generated > executables are for MIPS32 (when compiling for NanoNote). >=20 > I could dump Emacs in the target system, from a wrapper script, when > launched for the first time. But last time I tried that it failed = with > insufficient memory (32Mb RAM, no swap), so I'm going without dumping > for now. It sounds like running Emacs on such a system is going to be pretty = marginal in any case, but do you recall what part of it failed? Finding = the doc strings? The actual dumping? Ken=