From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Android port of Emacs Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 04:39:31 +0300 Message-ID: <6658e180-a1d4-5a76-65e4-ea765c3e51cd@gutov.dev> References: <83v8fnslfz.fsf@gnu.org> <83edmask4z.fsf@gnu.org> <5c02371a-3c42-de66-70b7-4ed0d88cc3fa@gutov.dev> <834jn159vs.fsf@gnu.org> <831qi23bif.fsf@gnu.org> <87jzvuy2e7.fsf@yahoo.com> <83sfai1nq6.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz1mxvc2.fsf@yahoo.com> <83lega1iv1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30876"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 24 03:40:38 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qCsGS-0007n7-Mp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 03:40:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qCsFf-0007Tc-2G; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 21:39:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qCsFe-0007TS-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 21:39:46 -0400 Original-Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qCsFY-0003a3-F4; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 21:39:45 -0400 Original-Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ED75C007A; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 21:39:35 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 23 Jun 2023 21:39:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gutov.dev; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t= 1687570775; x=1687657175; bh=HiB6okep/6MdmMzYdDVXlGKRaW3ZrZcIxph 5MQabbIY=; b=fui0Dq926NXgbwum06gPODNBiNa1zUH9ZDwlMAmzWfBfCKvG+La dbd8UdXxC1LmwTmYMVrzs3c8AQgTK4Q/EI/RRM/aCj2PseZ0qx9O9NegzoivIT1C crkiLDU/aL4ljBmX/6cZ+Z7iwv5PUoURFpsUYAMlbPvgbEuudUvwsb2KjAvmYtp4 XyJ993Pz9AYUfKDIZOx89KcZ4r9N1qfswEs0gSEJnzncfRUQEiNFd80znUqvqNBs TIEYHt/0uxDWiSOtQZGhlvzC0xxMUYdGIjiQNAmsIA0lHaVVotQPeBdFe/3/7Rzv mS7JvtSTgqp4SKXuNvam9ygpVxmOn9JWLZg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1687570775; x=1687657175; bh=HiB6okep/6MdmMzYdDVXlGKRaW3ZrZcIxph 5MQabbIY=; b=isreMCsVjJgU8xu5nBinfetInxJ8RFTA6Ql3Jx5hGdpqJtQtAeP vMdRZEex9vOPRhgt8VP841tW2z4lPmYHuNcLPYbypfgYL5pmOSDPpepIWy/VqkSL OtGn0i7KNhzPLgmKOHzOTrl4BdabdE39Q+rfpiZxeNusCx4bqU5K1XAgX85CF5r6 9jpxasvo3Gdex2nagJhWT01n470pe9gMzvSJOw8MfUbjDuhNvNyOPXoElUnHZU6d GuXhrewft31x5Jq+clCPQVX0gkSswmYD5duwsO+RyIAcvYeiXOBsa3mTXOmGSLW7 RhwOBPypRcTpbYyMtrCuJvq3zQgYiqCJbDQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrgeegiedgtdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeffmhhi thhrhicuifhuthhovhcuoegumhhithhrhiesghhuthhovhdruggvvheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepiefgteevheevveffheeltdeukeeiieekueefgedugfefgefhudelgfefveel vdevnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepug hmihhtrhihsehguhhtohhvrdguvghv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0e71465a:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 21:39:34 -0400 (EDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <83lega1iv1.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.25; envelope-from=dmitry@gutov.dev; helo=out1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.09, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:307166 Archived-At: On 23/06/2023 15:08, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > This description doesn't fit the reality. People who use the NS port > are quite disappointed by the problems that don't get solved, and I as > the maintainer cannot remain indifferent to their plight. It breaks > my heart that I can do almost nothing to facilitate the solution of > those problems. If we don't add the Android port, would that help the would-be users of it (whether the selected alternative is to move it outside the core, or not develop it anymore)? Probably not. It seems more like you are concerned about having an extra thing on your plate, which is totally reasonable. And we've talked in the past about trying to make Emacs more modular (meaning, moving more stuff out). Unfortunately, platform ports are not in the category of things that are easy to split off. Not currently, at least.