From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display word wrapping Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 06:43:01 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <6654-Tue01Jun2004064300+0300-eliz@gnu.org> References: <9003-Sun30May2004202740+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <20040531232133.1C7C.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1086063604 18052 80.91.224.253 (1 Jun 2004 04:20:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 04:20:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 01 06:19:53 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BV0kj-0000im-00 for ; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 06:19:53 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BV0ki-00069X-00 for ; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 06:19:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BV0kv-0004Cr-Vs for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:20:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BV0kt-0004Cl-0c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:20:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BV0kq-0004CZ-V9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BV0kq-0004CW-Rd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:20:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.23] (helo=aragorn.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BV0kC-0004fn-82 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:19:20 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.152.211]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id CZP66302; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 06:45:12 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Juanma Barranquero X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <20040531232133.1C7C.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> (message from Juanma Barranquero on Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:19:14 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24333 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24333 > Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:19:14 +0200 > From: Juanma Barranquero > > There are workarounds; in the case of lookup_image, just making the > variable "static" works (and it's a bit less ugly than interspersing > _asm calls or whatnot). I haven't yet researched what happens with > png_read_from_memory, but it's small, so there's no problem on > de-optimizing it. > > So, unless someone has a better idea, I propose the attached patch. This change looks good to me, but I suggest to put a comment where you turn off optimizations explaining why it is being done (it could be the same text as where you use `static').