From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pip Cet via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: __builtin_expect Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 22:06:23 +0000 Message-ID: <65DeedwGx3mNShTWZMb0k01QTXUY9A-d5Ox4d7YGcTZ0lOtb_zdFmOI8NqzfdvSmY_t6fTkV80c3ZsWfvG5-efytXA6vDKg_UjucTTDV0eA=@protonmail.com> References: <-RjfswKL3C48Xb5i4UIUxCjnwRceVcJLWbxPqC118LgFluGk1pC9nPnX7uvy2pfLr9_tIT4c6LRO47ggVIB5_jw91LHlu4SrGGkJYOd4j8k=@protonmail.com> Reply-To: Pip Cet Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26318"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Emacs Devel To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 29 07:55:11 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tGuuF-0006f3-Pe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 07:55:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tGutZ-0003it-TT; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 01:54:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tGmeh-0002p9-Ux for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:06:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-10630.protonmail.ch ([79.135.106.30]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tGmef-0005S3-H5; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:06:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1732831586; x=1733090786; bh=8oud3sMdEeCRRoHQMEnnj6r5zea/P74mriA98pfqJYA=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=B3IilfbyxK/ywjEMI0o6hpMbRAV4tnjAauUs09NJ73IcIa9JvBqDdAAipZ/gVIrq3 at1VLtSzbTy0WH14DJtFRC3N0M0pvDlm4NPFGg59rMLwXX6Cyy+p2kkMHoN2+ihjRN RlQfuEaLpupA0O4IeB8oaRojOSZDoFhuFLYojmo4amk5hbFXNbev5ol0QFZcub8KoD L7ex5r78wtyrPPo8prBlOZ1HvWNA2Qc/IUxUXhGWaTJdIIj10ZaNz0iso+qHfGthYU brStk7hDi6ulrrCmsV7bKhS6TowdVzJfTBkvWP73zcvanbXmJNsdCcrf/uIi2ibyFO i+fVnKZIwl9Eg== In-Reply-To: Feedback-ID: 112775352:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: ca29476dd3135f748916c8f8a2c30731bc98eff9 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=79.135.106.30; envelope-from=pipcet@protonmail.com; helo=mail-10630.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 01:54:28 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325839 Archived-At: On Thursday, November 28th, 2024 at 21:32, Andrea Corallo wrote: > Pip Cet pipcet@protonmail.com writes: > > > > But even if we can rely on the existence of the macro, "happens to > > > It was already in use in the Emacs code-base before my commit, > >=20 > > You mean the two usages in src/android.c? >=20 > grep is your friend That's quite rude (obviously, grep only finds the two usages in android.c a= nd usages in lib/, outside of the Emacs code base). I won't continue this = discussion. Pip