From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display word wrapping Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 19:51:15 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <6480-Wed26May2004195114+0300-eliz@gnu.org> References: <20040526125439.GA10795@fencepost> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085598918 6823 80.91.224.253 (26 May 2004 19:15:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 19:15:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed May 26 21:15:06 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BT3rl-0002rD-00 for ; Wed, 26 May 2004 21:15:05 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BT3rl-0006i4-00 for ; Wed, 26 May 2004 21:15:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BT3GZ-0003gi-NF for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 14:36:39 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BT3GD-0003eD-E3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 14:36:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BT3Ff-0003Wx-QB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 14:36:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.23] (helo=aragorn.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BT1fO-0001F8-Tv; Wed, 26 May 2004 12:54:11 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.144.82]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id CYK20542; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:53:37 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: David Kastrup X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: (message from David Kastrup on 26 May 2004 16:50:24 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:23970 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:23970 > From: David Kastrup > Date: 26 May 2004 16:50:24 +0200 > > But I think it would probably be shortsighted to tackle automatic > word wrap before the Bidi branch has been merged as well: that one > has a lot of potential for interference with word wrapping. Out of curiosity: why do you think so? That is, what aspects of bidirectional support did you have in mind when you wrote that?