* which-func-mode again
@ 2005-03-29 5:26 Stephan Stahl
2005-03-29 14:17 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-30 0:03 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Stahl @ 2005-03-29 5:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi.
Would someone please apply this patch?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-03/msg00105.html
Richard seemed to think the patch is ok and no one else objected
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-03/msg00185.html
Thanks
Stephan
--
Stephan Stahl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: which-func-mode again
2005-03-29 5:26 which-func-mode again Stephan Stahl
@ 2005-03-29 14:17 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-30 0:03 ` Richard Stallman
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2005-03-29 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
> Would someone please apply this patch?
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-03/msg00105.html
> Richard seemed to think the patch is ok and no one else objected
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-03/msg00185.html
Installed,
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: which-func-mode again
2005-03-29 5:26 which-func-mode again Stephan Stahl
2005-03-29 14:17 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2005-03-30 0:03 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-30 8:53 ` Stephan Stahl
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2005-03-30 0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
Richard seemed to think the patch is ok and no one else objected
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-03/msg00185.html
ISTR that there was further discussion which suggested this might not
be quite the right patch. That is why I didn't install it. However,
I have not had time to investigate what would be exactly the right
patch.
Can you find the further discussion? I think it was just a day or two
after you sent that patch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: which-func-mode again
2005-03-30 0:03 ` Richard Stallman
@ 2005-03-30 8:53 ` Stephan Stahl
2005-03-31 18:21 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Stahl @ 2005-03-30 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Stephan Stahl, emacs-devel
Hi Richard.
Richard Stallman said:
> ISTR that there was further discussion which suggested this might not
> be quite the right patch. That is why I didn't install it. However,
> I have not had time to investigate what would be exactly the right
> patch.
>
> Can you find the further discussion? I think it was just a day or two
> after you sent that patch.
I can neither find nor remember any futher discussion.. Those three
mails are the only ones that seem to belong to this thread:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-03/msg00105.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-03/msg00176.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-03/msg00185.html
This first two from me, one with the patch and one trying to explain
the sitiation a little bit more. The last one is yours.
All other mails regarding which-func (emacs-devel archives search
*which-func*) are much older. Hope i did not cause any confusion by
misunderstanding you.
In case someone finds a better solution remember to remove the old
patch..
Stephan
--
Stephan Stahl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: which-func-mode again
2005-03-30 8:53 ` Stephan Stahl
@ 2005-03-31 18:21 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-31 20:51 ` Stephan Stahl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2005-03-31 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: stahl, emacs-devel
I can neither find nor remember any futher discussion.. Those three
mails are the only ones that seem to belong to this thread:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-03/msg00105.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-03/msg00176.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-03/msg00185.html
I can't access messages thru URLs. Everyone, please, when you want to
identify a past message, always show the date and the Subject field.
Anyway, I think I was concerned to make sure that different buffers
were not interfering with each other. Now I've looked at the code
and see that they don't. So I think this change is the right fix.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: which-func-mode again
2005-03-31 18:21 ` Richard Stallman
@ 2005-03-31 20:51 ` Stephan Stahl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Stahl @ 2005-03-31 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
Hi Richard.
Richard Stallman said:
> I can't access messages thru URLs. Everyone, please, when you want to
> identify a past message, always show the date and the Subject field.
I'll remember that.
> Anyway, I think I was concerned to make sure that different buffers
> were not interfering with each other. Now I've looked at the code
> and see that they don't. So I think this change is the right fix.
That's good. Thanks for checking.
Stephan
--
Stephan Stahl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-31 20:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-29 5:26 which-func-mode again Stephan Stahl
2005-03-29 14:17 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-30 0:03 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-30 8:53 ` Stephan Stahl
2005-03-31 18:21 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-31 20:51 ` Stephan Stahl
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).