From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexandre Garreau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Contradictiory directions Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:54:03 +0100 Message-ID: <6425211.HdX0WEmjLp@galex-713.eu> References: <20211211035614.15517.53830@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87fsquqhcn.fsf@yahoo.com> <87o85i3um7.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39752"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 15 16:36:56 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mxWKt-000A9w-GG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:36:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41812 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxWKs-0006ji-AN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:36:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58438) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxVfW-0004ke-Vf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:54:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a00:5884:8305::1] (port=36498 helo=galex-713.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxVfV-0004FQ-3d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:54:10 -0500 Original-Received: from gal by galex-713.eu with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxVfQ-0038ze-CQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:54:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87o85i3um7.fsf@telefonica.net> X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:5884:8305::1 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:5884:8305::1; envelope-from=galex-713@galex-713.eu; helo=galex-713.eu X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282059 Archived-At: Le merkredo, 15-a de decembro 2021, 13-a horo kaj 44:48 CET =C3=93scar Fuen= tes=20 a =C3=A9crit : > The scenario of someone sneaking in a non-free SQLite extension against > the user's wishes is a bit far-fetched, to say the least. So we are > wasting a lot of energy worrying about how to effectively inconvenience > our users for "protecting" them from an unlikely event no matter how > much limitations are imposed on the feature being discussed. I thought > that the gcc/llvm debacle would be understood at this point. Many systems have been showed to disrespect users=E2=80=99 choice that way.= It=E2=80=99s=20 a little stretched for debian, impossible for trisquel, but imaginable on=20 ubuntu, and likely under mac os x, ios, windows and android (and these are= =20 way more used).