From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: c.buhtz@posteo.jp Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Help with debugging Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:03:12 +0000 Message-ID: <62c90d107f39e858da29360c239f9651@posteo.de> References: <8597902ce1e4e43b0e0285cb55fd76d6@posteo.de> <87y1nhw0lu.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4146"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 28 16:04:26 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ph9w1-0000mx-2m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 16:04:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ph9v2-0004qY-R6; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 10:03:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ph9v0-0004pu-EP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 10:03:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ph9uu-0002A2-Ue for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 10:03:22 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FED1240423 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 16:03:13 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.jp; s=2017; t=1680012193; bh=rFF8+/8DbIIPRBBOn7L/+wFJATQvQj53olxGr3VMZL0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=fD01dQsnmQKuMo0LJyvXwP9QNC9UeR17SmxOZjj0KuqxArqguY2QKUweDVC7ZyEBx zBMPaywMAb50BhV1TX56m7I2lPArTe/h4mjqqRY6+Vm6SX+CUqDZWnU7HkJKoI4vT/ Rm/ROq4dj6jelhJpEJ2GIsjxcdZ/sDO2qlss3zmbt4u/1HirJdKFpEL9h7Hb4Bteyp L/5eLiIf9zXKUudV7IMxnQpmiqsbuIQX8T5LVe6RkxqjJuOT4dmfyZCB1lKnmhO10q 1B1m9bdE4zlAyMjwdtOKpkeoG8me0qTQ2QNqyBU0rxR+5Duh3HcLOEoBEe5O7LQzNL qK8/slSKtpHIg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4PmBGm51CNz6trm for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 16:03:12 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87y1nhw0lu.fsf@web.de> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=c.buhtz@posteo.jp; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304802 Archived-At: Dear Michael, thanks for reply. Am 28.03.2023 13:56 schrieb Michael Heerdegen: > Are we sure that this doesn't happen because the system is running out > of RAM? Good idea. But Emacs 27 was running well on the same machine including an open Thunderbird and XFCE desktop (via XRDP). Does Emacs 29 consume much more RAM then 27? I'll have a closer look the next time.