From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: completions - remove window after use? Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:45:52 -0500 Message-ID: <61C01A08-8FB6-4908-B9F1-B9F1CE3E3D92@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1257968778 20983 80.91.229.12 (11 Nov 2009 19:46:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:46:18 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs development discussions Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 11 20:46:11 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N8J8q-0007Qq-Gb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:46:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43437 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N8J8q-00008C-2h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:46:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N8J8l-00007W-EY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:46:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N8J8g-00006G-Db for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:46:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34927 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N8J8g-00006D-8s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:45:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pz0-f192.google.com ([209.85.222.192]:33480) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N8J8f-0007iL-Tc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:45:58 -0500 Original-Received: by pzk30 with SMTP id 30so1015922pzk.24 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:45:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version :x-mailer; bh=nyiyKU7XoQ9qNkobqskqqtOtN8AuIGACHseAzdnEB3I=; b=QPlLYr1zwPfGdNzQN79xZoR1xoaB1PKMW7gCbc37dWkZoo7LjdIWgGob/MjWetwcVs Y7eEEwTYqVpqZYsp62pDidWe9fTwz3mLvGk/fsPsN8j8oz9SWNDEQ5iuddK2o8jB+lD2 wr1ycKsfn86TnmFY+1dM3P5kZKCjkDlAJIHy4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=oYvwRHM4Slttdruh5lDoC99JlNwJ4E1gIwZ8lRkxlH/Z7EdX4UsY829iHs0FuiSMnj IbZzcq/6FmK2M4tUyp4iNadMqbzeXoLa49tMwN4MxUXtlOu00l/2tcxmEpten7dVaL/O KwDqVfl/L0WavqQvDepWVAqdcmN4/w/gUh5+4= Original-Received: by 10.114.119.6 with SMTP id r6mr4054970wac.45.1257968756387; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:45:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from scarlett.psy.cmu.edu (SCARLETT.PSY.CMU.EDU [128.2.249.106]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm1255236pxi.9.2009.11.11.11.45.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:45:55 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116838 Archived-At: When showing a *completions* buffer in a new window opened for it (TAB = in find-file minibuffer for instance), I wonder why the window doesn't = get deleted when completion has finished. For instance, when an = existing file is found, the *Completions* buffer is buried, but I see a = split frame with the original buffer in the top window and _some other_ = buffer in the lower window. Shouldn't the window for the completions buffer be removed whenever it = has been popped up just for the buffer?