From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 b6d6304: Comment on last change to define-derived-mode Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 14:33:14 +0200 Message-ID: <60aac271-5a19-29e5-c272-ff7e38a940ec@yandex.ru> References: <20160301035146.26012.60163@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457440429 2068 80.91.229.3 (8 Mar 2016 12:33:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 12:33:49 +0000 (UTC) To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 08 13:33:42 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1adGpZ-0005rk-PY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 13:33:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34108 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adGpZ-0008RB-47 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 07:33:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adGpG-0008Qq-8X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 07:33:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adGpC-00020c-5O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 07:33:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]:36268) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adGpB-00020E-VX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 07:33:18 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id n186so129278827wmn.1 for ; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 04:33:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AfLOBgjMH589CZ4+MRmQBTOiDTrGTefN1RUm8S5dc9U=; b=QUsqoy0qLKVOsDqIqhVeiHMQBGMqEgau986QHb6xoJk+tiRJ19cmT8I9XqGv5hbSFd Npf0PHRzRAQzaEbH6yEGnwTo3Ci45QsZIsMwPNgH0Ctg4ifzkPJDuyc41PzdsIfnvWo/ c0+7TqXiTHu7Iocfai12O0AJ/XW6VjNMnnmVzK2MAEvzy8MTmnxLY9tKulTAp3Txmrvc pT1mhdWiJV5q82R7RkwLzCxFL7eZhPvMEcgbsOQvE1U0DklPSDIeqm+s+1qy+H0xjEDK sMUN/v/fuPAfcrudCBEcYf4p8S1l2ufvLOqYZjHh0pl8rdqe5Nyv4h82EZ1txUouNt66 Ufhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AfLOBgjMH589CZ4+MRmQBTOiDTrGTefN1RUm8S5dc9U=; b=GHbJlUzY0aoDbkbel1aeTPEFji/RzPovDlSIFXE4LNsmA4U19jZbeQqatpkqq+fmYb bZCMaQytMNB0N30mlomkb5DHVWXTwMOjDCQbk+dOq2Vp5+A0X1reYNSFXymGaBLAFgm8 k58CWUSxQY6Lq0sE5Y9e+U7crVUS6cDP60ZLMTLjYSq8hZRQ0g6r+MIrMueAyrtcKEE2 5jhL8GLYryGJhcpSGAGhbFILn7mVVg/mzMNtX366QPvNOKRXrbonIF+gwQE3sWDKaI74 9BM2tbeMTly07vcAbjcW+aAu4dKbDCMpt+qPNIKRlrCzxjZdt74mjaz4eiYXbgBq0JV0 grXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIX4LUIR+tgqaS1KPkLPn74Q6bAItjtjna1khz1f7bLitHUBbd0jCJnjJisdypzqQ== X-Received: by 10.194.184.234 with SMTP id ex10mr27229692wjc.8.1457440397064; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 04:33:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id jo6sm2735775wjb.48.2016.03.08.04.33.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 Mar 2016 04:33:16 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201139 Archived-At: On 03/08/2016 06:35 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > My *only* point was to ask to get some concrete example > where the patch was undesirable, so that we know concretely why the > change was undone. Are we going to keep the newly added comment there, the one that doesn't provide the above information?