From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Status of MAC/W32/X consolidation and some questions. Date: 13 Mar 2003 00:01:00 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xzno0tck3.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <5xadg38lnj.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5xheaaq93k.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <2427-Wed12Mar2003212750+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1047506599 16567 80.91.224.249 (12 Mar 2003 22:03:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 12 23:03:18 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18tEIa-0004Cn-00 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:02:08 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18tEg0-0003u8-00 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:26:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18tEIw-0003ft-02 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:02:30 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18tEIb-0003ds-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:02:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18tEIZ-0003d4-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:02:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18tEIZ-0003cv-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:02:07 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EAA67C017; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:02:05 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <2427-Wed12Mar2003212750+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> Original-Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:12320 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:12320 "Eli Zaretskii" writes: > > From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) > > Date: 11 Mar 2003 15:19:27 +0100 > > > > * move common parts of x_output, w32_output, and mac_output directly > > into the frame structure. Then code doesn't have to go through the > > correct output_data macro, but can get to the data directly from the > > frame pointer. This adds some overhead to the frame structure for > > non-windowing frames, but it's a VERY SMALL price to pay for > > increased portability. > > Careful here. IIUC, you are going to touch tty-specific code as well. > If that's true, please consider also the MSDOS code (which also > fiddles with the x_output and related things). Ideally, it should > not be broken by whatever you do ;-) Thanks for the reminder -- but I'm aware that the msdos port has a "fake" x_output structure, that I need to handle correctly too. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk