From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: recent emacs font problems? Date: 10 Jun 2003 02:17:44 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xwufun5uf.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <3EE4784F.70604@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1055198640 2942 80.91.224.249 (9 Jun 2003 22:44:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 22:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 10 00:43:58 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19PVMs-0000lA-00 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:43:58 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19PVh5-0003lc-00 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 01:04:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19PVNr-0006RS-E9 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2003 18:44:59 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19PVHu-00049H-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2003 18:38:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19PV4M-0000Ro-FW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2003 18:24:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19PUzG-0007xO-KO; Mon, 09 Jun 2003 18:19:34 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D9287C019; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:19:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: "Jan D." In-Reply-To: <3EE4784F.70604@swipnet.se> Original-Lines: 32 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Original-cc: rms@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14970 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14970 "Jan D." writes: > I cant really grasp the problem that lead to this change from the > comment above, so if anyone can describe a case for the original > problem, I can try and make this work. Here is what RMS said about the exact same fix some days ago; please read the previous articles in this thread for a discussion on this subject: RMS> That is not correct. It would bring back a bug I fixed recently. I RMS> think it was the following bug. Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 09:59:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Klaus Straubinger To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org If the font family of the default face is changed with (set-face-attribute 'default nil :family "fixed") then this does not change the face's font for subsequent frames, as can be seen with the evaluation of (face-font 'default) in the first frame and in a second, created with C-x 5 2, respectively. I found that that call to set_lface_from_font_name was clobbering the family that had come from the new-frame default. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk