From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: comint read-only prompt Date: 21 Aug 2002 01:23:25 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xu1lp2jyq.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <200208191540.g7JFemV13663@rum.cs.yale.edu> <1029772679.16562.13.camel@turtle.as.arizona.edu> <200208201721.g7KHLcb09801@wijiji.santafe.edu> <20020820211243.GA28081@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1029882268 1933 127.0.0.1 (20 Aug 2002 22:24:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Richard Stallman , jdsmith@as.arizona.edu, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, miles@lsi.nec.co.jp, simon.marshall@misys.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17hHQI-0000V3-00 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 00:24:26 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17hHsP-00082y-00 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 00:53:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17hHRO-0006EM-00; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 18:25:34 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17hHOw-0005wR-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 18:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17hHOu-0005w6-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 18:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17hHOt-0005w0-00; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 18:23:00 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id C43D57C016; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:22:57 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: <20020820211243.GA28081@gnu.org> Original-Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6691 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6691 Miles Bader writes: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:21:38AM -0600, Richard Stallman wrote: > > It seems rather inconsistent to me to make the newest prompt read-only > > and not the other prompts. > > Given the annoyance that read-only past > prompts could cause, and the fact that they are very unlikely to need > protection, I think this split is a good one. I agree. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk