From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower? Date: 05 Jan 2003 00:54:27 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xu1gojwss.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <87adpxob2n.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> <200206152147.g5FLlfU10992@aztec.santafe.edu> <87bs5r1cyp.fsf@gnu.org> <87hecud8ef.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> <87u1gqpyss.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> <87lm21pn8f.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1041721324 5012 80.91.224.249 (4 Jan 2003 23:02:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 23:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18UxIn-0001IA-00 for ; Sun, 05 Jan 2003 00:02:01 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18UxM6-0002q1-00 for ; Sun, 05 Jan 2003 00:05:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18UxIN-0003ep-00 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 18:01:35 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18UxES-0002n7-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 17:57:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18UxC6-0002GJ-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 17:55:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18UxBz-00020O-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 17:54:59 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id EEE007C012; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 23:54:56 +0100 (CET) Original-To: John Wiegley In-Reply-To: <87lm21pn8f.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> Original-Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:10483 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:10483 John Wiegley writes: > I will have to allocate time next week to isolating this problem for > you. > wide-column.el does various things with the current buffer and the cursor color in the post-command-hook; I don't know if there are changes from 21.2 to 21.3 related to the cursor or current buffer that may explain the slow-down. Maybe you can selectively comment-out various parts of the function added to the post-command-hook to see what may be responsible for the slow-down. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk