From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: no-spam@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: let vs. buffer local bindings
Date: 10 May 2002 16:53:31 +0200
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <5xsn50xdec.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
References: <5xy9esxewc.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
	<r5ielgk16js.fsf@gill.maths.keele.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021038843 11908 127.0.0.1 (10 May 2002 13:54:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 13:54:03 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org,  Dave Pearson <davep.news@davep.org>
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 176AqR-00035x-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 10 May 2002 15:54:03 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 176AzY-0002eM-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 10 May 2002 16:03:28 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 176AqV-0003z3-00; Fri, 10 May 2002 09:54:07 -0400
Original-Received: from fepb.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.145])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 176ApB-0003wV-00
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Fri, 10 May 2002 09:52:45 -0400
Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk ([194.239.225.46]) by fepB.post.tele.dk
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.23 201-229-121-123-20010418) with SMTP
          id <20020510135244.YZEU19716.fepB.post.tele.dk@kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk>;
          Fri, 10 May 2002 15:52:44 +0200
Original-To: Gareth Owen <usenet@gwowen.freeserve.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <r5ielgk16js.fsf@gill.maths.keele.ac.uk>
Original-Lines: 17
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3810
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3810

Gareth Owen <usenet@gwowen.freeserve.co.uk> writes:

> storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> 
> > Gareth Owen <usenet@gwowen.freeserve.co.uk> has found a peculiar
> > interference between let and buffer local bindings.
> > 
> > Does anyone care to comment on the following result:
> 
> It should be noted that this seems only to be the case with 20.7.
> Behaviour is more comprehensible in 21.1

My results are from the latest CVS emacs (aka 21.4), so there's still
something to explain :-)

-- 
Kim F. Storm <storm@cua.dk> http://www.cua.dk