From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-x C-f RET problem... Date: 16 May 2002 23:51:22 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xsn4r4v8l.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <1021575722.24318.936.camel@space-ghost> <878z6jgakj.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021582278 20478 127.0.0.1 (16 May 2002 20:51:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 20:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Colin Walters , emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 178SDV-0005KA-00 for ; Thu, 16 May 2002 22:51:17 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 178SPg-000505-00 for ; Thu, 16 May 2002 23:03:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 178SDX-0003Ry-00; Thu, 16 May 2002 16:51:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 178SCx-0003Lr-00; Thu, 16 May 2002 16:50:43 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id ECB3E7C016; Thu, 16 May 2002 20:50:36 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: <878z6jgakj.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> Original-Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4022 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4022 Miles Bader writes: > Colin Walters writes: > > I agree with Miles in that it's not something we should change lightly. > > But I've been using Kevin Rodgers' defadvice for a long time, and been > > very happy > > I suppose I should be more explicit: I'm against this change, because > I use the current functionality (revisit-the-current-file) functionality > extremely often. I know habits are hard to change, but C-x C-v RET does that as well (but then again, C-x d runs dired...). -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk