From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: no-spam@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX Date: 11 Jul 2002 16:48:02 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xsn2qpbh9.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <20020710104625.D772.LEKTU@terra.es> <5x3cuqqtru.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <20020711150740.5C22.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026395259 8880 127.0.0.1 (11 Jul 2002 13:47:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm), rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17SeIE-0002J7-00 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:47:38 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17SeRe-0002j1-00 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:57:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17SeIl-0007W5-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:48:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17SeI2-0007V5-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:47:26 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (kfs2.local.filanet.dk [192.168.1.182]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id A1A427C019; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:47:24 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: <20020711150740.5C22.LEKTU@terra.es> Original-Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5653 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5653 Juanma Barranquero writes: > On 11 Jul 2002 15:27:33 +0200, storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) wrote: > > > For consistency, I suggest to change all occurrences of `specpdl_ptr - > > specpdl' to SPECPDL_INDEX. > > OK, I'll take care of it. > > > I'd suggest changing the name of those variables to `specpdl_index' or > > just `spix' (which isn't currently used anywhere) for short. > > "spix" seems a bit cryptic to me. Less cryptic that specpdl_index? :-) Actually, `specpdl_index' isn't really good either, as it is not the current index, but the saved index. Maybe one of these is better: old_specpdl saved_specpdl specpdl_save specpdl_base base_specpdl specpdl_top -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk