From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: while-no-input Date: 24 Oct 2002 02:06:59 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xr8egzom4.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <200210012119.g91LJW922045@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200210022143.g92LhXQ28321@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200210031553.g93FrwH31218@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200210041559.g94Fx9006880@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035414425 18545 80.91.224.249 (23 Oct 2002 23:07:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:07:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 184Uad-0004oo-00 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 01:07:03 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 184UcX-0003Sb-00 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 01:09:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 184Uar-0004VA-00; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:07:17 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 184UaT-00043I-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:06:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 184UaR-000406-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:06:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 184UaR-0003yV-00; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:06:51 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id EE4287C012; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:06:49 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" In-Reply-To: <200210041559.g94Fx9006880@rum.cs.yale.edu> Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8704 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8704 "Stefan Monnier" writes: > > However, it would cleaner if instead of generating a quit signal it > > did a throw to a specified tag. > > The reason I didn't do that is that it didn't seem necessary > and that I didn't want the QUIT macro to grow, but I could introduce > a new function `quit' that the QUIT macro could call and which would > either call `Fsignal (Qquit, Qnil)' ot `Fthrow (...)'. Richard Stallman writes: > That would be ok. Stefan, What happened with this feature? -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk