From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should customizing default-frame-alist change existing frames? Date: 04 Mar 2002 22:29:10 +0100 Message-ID: <5xpu2k3tuh.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <20020301112225.9416.LEKTU@terra.es> <200203011833.g21IXhB09976@rum.cs.yale.edu> <20020304101136.DA6F.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1015277805 17990 195.204.10.66 (4 Mar 2002 21:36:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Mar 2002 21:36:45 GMT Cc: "Daniel Ortmann" Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16i08S-0004g4-00 for ; Mon, 04 Mar 2002 22:36:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16i024-0003cj-00; Mon, 04 Mar 2002 16:30:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16i00A-0003Vf-00 for ; Mon, 04 Mar 2002 16:28:10 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id AB6D67C047; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:28:06 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20020304101136.DA6F.LEKTU@terra.es> Original-Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1722 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1722 Juanma Barranquero writes: > On Fri, 01 Mar 2002 13:33:43 -0500, "Stefan Monnier" wrote: > > > It wouldn't be "perfect" but should be mostly acceptable. > > > > I don't think that leaving dedicated frames as-is is a good answer [...] > > I'm starting to think that's one of those issues where there's > considerable individual variation; So maybe it could be customizeable (with sensible default setting). A simple list with the frame parameters where changes should be reflected on all frames could do the trick. [of course this should be a defcustom], e.g. (defvar frame-parameters-all-frames '(background-mode scroll-bar-background scroll-bar-foreground border-color cursor-color mouse-color background-color foreground-color font)) -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel