From: no-spam@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
Cc: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>,
storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm),
rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX
Date: 12 Jul 2002 12:16:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5xptxtuu8h.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020712094217.2E7C.LEKTU@terra.es>
Juanma Barranquero <lektu@terra.es> writes:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:08:58 -0400, "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu> wrote:
>
> > But the count -> index|spix|... switch is just plain silly
Changes which can improve the maintainablility of the code are not silly.
You may not want them, and we may decide against them, but that doesn't
make them silly.
It seems that some emacs hackers have a habit of keeping big thunks of
changes locally for a long time... That's fine, but doing so should
not prevent others from maintaining the code in CVS.
>
> Hmm... Not really. There are six or seven different names for the same
> concept through the code. Unifying them would be useful, if only to make
> understanding simpler for newcomers (like me).
Exactly my experience.
>
> But I suppose others will have to decide what to do in that case :)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-12 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-09 18:52 BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX Richard Stallman
2002-07-10 8:46 ` Juanma Barranquero
2002-07-11 13:27 ` Kim F. Storm
2002-07-11 13:08 ` Juanma Barranquero
2002-07-11 14:48 ` Kim F. Storm
2002-07-11 15:09 ` Juanma Barranquero
2002-07-11 15:48 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-07-11 16:04 ` Juanma Barranquero
2002-07-11 16:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-07-11 17:05 ` Juanma Barranquero
2002-07-11 17:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-07-12 7:45 ` Juanma Barranquero
2002-07-12 10:16 ` Kim F. Storm [this message]
2002-07-12 17:37 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-13 3:20 ` Juanma Barranquero
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5xptxtuu8h.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk \
--to=no-spam@cua.dk \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=storm@cua.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).