From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 4, Issue 70 Date: 01 Apr 2003 00:48:42 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xof3r6tkl.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <5xhe9t2ayx.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5xof3vmsxy.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1049147869 16013 80.91.224.249 (31 Mar 2003 21:57:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 21:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 31 23:57:45 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1907Hl-00049Z-00 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 23:57:45 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 1907I3-0001C8-00 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 23:58:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 1907Hk-0005W6-02 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:57:44 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 1907HO-0005Rv-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:57:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 1907HM-0005Pb-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:57:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 1907AD-0003IF-00; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:49:57 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id EF33A7C012; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 23:49:55 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:12776 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:12776 Richard Stallman writes: > * I revert my latest patch (which makes this a customize option), > and just have the new behaviour . > > I think that is better. I don't see the sense in having an option > for one and not for the other. Perhaps it would be good to have > an option to control both at once; but if nobody is complaining, > we may as well not bother. So far, I have only received (very) positive feedback for the new C-u C-SPC C-SPC... functionality, and I don't see why anyone would like to turn it off. I would expect the C-x C-SPC C-SPC will be received equally positive by the users... I have reverted the patch and removed the option to turn off the new behaviour. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk