From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality. Date: 19 Apr 2002 17:36:16 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xn0vz8zv3.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <5xbscpg7zl.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200204112243.g3BMhmI01190@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xd6x5i7ps.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5x4rih12b2.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200204121846.g3CIkZY16909@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xofgoobzr.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200204122021.g3CKLh217680@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xu1qd29od.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200204162018.g3GKI3S24358@aztec.santafe.edu> <5x662rxog2.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200204181846.g3IIk2K00596@aztec.santafe.edu> <5xk7r4mwqs.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200204191343.g3JDh1V09176@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019227014 2648 127.0.0.1 (19 Apr 2002 14:36:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16yZVN-0000gb-00 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 16:36:53 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16yZom-0001Ny-00 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 16:56:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16yZUv-0004wk-00; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 10:36:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16yZU0-0004t3-00 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 10:35:28 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (kfs2.local.filanet.dk [192.168.1.182]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id B53737C04C; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:35:26 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" In-Reply-To: <200204191343.g3JDh1V09176@rum.cs.yale.edu> Original-Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2786 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2786 "Stefan Monnier" writes: > > I've described that several times by now -- I'm trying to find the > > right approach to address the issues with complex modes which uses a > > lot of keymaps (like cua and viper) and base the selection between > > those keymaps on combining various state information, i.e. to provide > > a more versatile keymap functionality than what is currently > > available. > > I haven't heard any comment about my proposal to use `menu-item' > bindings with a :enable setting in order to get conditional bindings > (this doesn't currently work, but it should be pretty easy to make > it work). > Would it help you solve your problems ? Considering that cua has approx 100 bindings in 7 keymaps, it seems like absolute overkill IMO to condition each of those 100 bindings individually instead of just the 7 keymaps which contain those bindings... I don't think that is a _better_ solution. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk