From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bold by moving pixels problem Date: 17 Dec 2002 11:31:35 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xlm2pkkc8.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <20021120220834.GC29543@gnu.org> <200211210133.gAL1XiP23941@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1040117533 8049 80.91.224.249 (17 Dec 2002 09:32:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18OE5D-00025P-00 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:32:11 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18OEJ6-0004mT-00 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:46:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18OE5N-00069t-07 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 04:32:21 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18OE54-00066o-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 04:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18OE51-0005yi-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 04:32:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18OE50-0005uX-00; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 04:31:58 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (kfs2.local.filanet.dk [192.168.1.182]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E39B7C012; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:31:56 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Original-cc: bob@rattlesnake.com X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:10204 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:10204 Miles Bader writes: > > The basic interface is a variable, `realize-face-filter': Shouldn't it be called `realize-face-filter-function' ? > Also, perhaps `realize-face-filter' should be a list of functions > instead, e.g., `realize-face-filter-functions', as there might be > circumstances when two entities want to add a filter -- but maybe this > is something that will only ever be changed by the end-user, who can > make his own filter function do everything he wants. You may be right, but once the realize-face-filter-function feature has been added, some elisp package is bound to emerge which uses it to solve some unforeseen problem... and want to add its own filter function. So I definitely think it should be a list (and as you said in a subsequent mail, it really doesn't get called very often, so it shouldn't really matter). [Sorry, I haven't had time to look at the patch].