From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changing mode-line-inactive Date: 11 Feb 2002 10:33:18 +0100 Message-ID: <5xk7tkgy75.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <9791-Sat09Feb2002223804+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200202110209.g1B29Nh06591@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013420602 29988 195.204.10.66 (11 Feb 2002 09:43:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Feb 2002 09:43:22 GMT Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16aCzZ-0007na-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:43:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16aCph-0002y1-00; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 04:33:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16aCon-0002ob-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 04:32:14 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (kfs2.local.filanet.dk [192.168.1.182]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 52CD67C048; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:32:04 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: Karl Eichwalder In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 33 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:992 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:992 Karl Eichwalder writes: > Richard Stallman writes: > > > Is this not generally true now? > > The inactive mode line doesn't see the change; calling something like > switch-to-buffer will propagate it. Maybe, it is not necessary to care > about it as long as there's a recipe how to disable this new feature. Customizing faces to get rid of this might seem too radical, so maybe there should be a lisp variable to control this behaviour? The customization could have three choices: nil - use mode-line face for all mode lines t - use mode-line-inactive for inactive windows use mode-line face for active window and window that was selected when using the mini-buffer other - use mode-line-inactive even for the window that was selected when minibuffer is active. (the last option corresponds to the current behaviour and is my personal preference!) > At the moment I'm inclined to believe I should drop the 3D look to gain > one more pixel. When the :box width is specified as -1, you wont gain an extra pixel by removing the 3d look. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel