From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Updates to configure for make-network-process Date: 19 Mar 2002 23:21:58 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xk7s8yz95.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016577084 7551 127.0.0.1 (19 Mar 2002 22:31:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 22:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "David Ponce" , "emacs-devel" Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16nS8a-0001xh-00 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 23:31:24 +0100 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16nSE3-00029s-00 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 23:37:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16nS8R-0004sW-00; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:31:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16nRyj-0003cK-00; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:21:13 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id DAA6B7C035; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 22:21:00 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: Jason Rumney In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2053 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2053 Jason Rumney writes: > "David Ponce" writes: > > > > I successfully "make bootstrap install" latest CVS version of Emacs 21.3 > > with the following small patch to nt/config.nt and src/makefile.w32-in. > > Did it not build with those constants undefined? Until that > functionality can be verified on Windows (winsock differs from BSD > sockets in subtle ways), I would prefer to leave these undefined in > CVS. How would you verify the features without defining them? Having them defined is not supposed to change anything as long as you don't use any of the new features of make-network-process. But defining these now gives those who might be interested a chance to try out the new features on Windows and provide feedback on whether it is working - or what might be needed to make it work. If we don't define them now, when do you propose to define them? -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel