From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CUA Mode Date: 31 Mar 2002 22:34:16 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xk7rswk6v.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <7263-Fri29Mar2002103247+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017603498 32254 127.0.0.1 (31 Mar 2002 19:38:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 19:38:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16rl9e-0008O7-00 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 21:38:18 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16rlKW-0005hW-00 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 21:49:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16rl7h-0001ta-00; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 14:36:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16rl52-0001bo-00 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 14:33:32 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 648157C035; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 19:33:23 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <7263-Fri29Mar2002103247+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2282 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2282 "Eli Zaretskii" writes: > Kim, is there any reason why cua.el is not yet part of Emacs? IIRC, > last time this was discussed, the submission was delayed until the > release of v21.1, for some boring administrivia reasons. Can this be > done now? I'm currently rewriting central parts of CUA to use command remapping rather than the current implementation which relies on doing something similar in the pre-command hook. That's the top priority on my current to-do list for 21.3 -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk