From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New space char syntax Date: 15 Feb 2003 17:50:57 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xk7g15vym.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <20030214183145.66AF.LEKTU@terra.es> <8465rm7g6d.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <20030215005635.C288.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045324310 16871 80.91.224.249 (15 Feb 2003 15:51:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 15:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?q?Kai_Gro=DFjohann?= Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18k4bU-0004Ny-00 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:51:48 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18k4oz-0007pL-00 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 17:05:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18k4cN-0006Fs-01 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 10:52:43 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18k4bu-00069t-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 10:52:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18k4bc-0005WM-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 10:51:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18k4bZ-0005Go-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 10:51:53 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 586A77C018; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:51:50 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: <20030215005635.C288.LEKTU@terra.es> Original-Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11667 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11667 Juanma Barranquero writes: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:36:42 +0100 > kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Gro=C2=81=C3=9Fjohann) wrote: >=20 > > Difficult to say. I just changed all of them. But maybe I should go > > back and just change things like (? ?a). >=20 > I think so. It shouldn't be necessary to make any incompatible changes, > just fixing broken usages, like "? ?a" to "? ?a", "?C-g" to "?\C-g", > things like that. Please note that '(? ?a) is still valid syntax.=20=20 --=20 Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk