From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestion: Simple way to make conditional key bindings. Date: 29 Aug 2002 10:54:01 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xhehehwpi.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <3D49FF140074EFAE@mel-rta7.wanadoo.fr> <5xadnd3eck.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208231722.g7NHM0M02096@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xptw6wm2v.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208261547.g7QFlpA24835@rum.cs.yale.edu> <20020826193301.GA7248@gnu.org> <200208271905.g7RJ5hj13019@wijiji.santafe.edu> <5xsn0zgb8p.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030607637 15131 127.0.0.1 (29 Aug 2002 07:53:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:53:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk, miles@gnu.org, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, David.Ponce@wanadoo.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17kK7m-0003vk-00 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:53:54 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17kKdx-0005Ra-00 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:27:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17kK9A-0006UW-00; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:55:20 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17kK7a-0006N7-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:53:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17kK7Y-0006Mv-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:53:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17kK7Y-0006Mo-00; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:53:40 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (kfs2.local.filanet.dk [192.168.1.182]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 66EC47C017; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:53:38 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7098 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7098 Richard Stallman writes: > Remapping works by taking the result of the normal key lookup, say > `yank' for C-y and perform a new lookup (in the exact same keymaps) > for the vector [remap yank]. But it will not (and cannot) check the > keymap property of the text _to_be_yanked_. > > Nothing in Emacs will check the keymap property of the text to be > yanked. Conditional key bindings wouldn't do that either. So how > does this relate? In the context of discussing how to make C-y/yank behave differently depending on the text it is going to yank, checking for a [remap yank] keymap property in the to_be_yanked text might be a (far-fetched) possibility.