From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.. Date: 09 Sep 2002 00:51:37 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xheh0umbq.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <87lm6xiruh.fsf@computer.localdomain> <5xu1liwmu6.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208261526.g7QFQX624783@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xu1lgu1e4.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208271621.g7RGLNm30516@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xhehfe3aj.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <87d6rzpybd.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> <5xy9aj3zo1.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031521994 2139 127.0.0.1 (8 Sep 2002 21:53:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 21:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@gnu.org, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, deego@glue.umd.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17o9zT-0000YM-00 for ; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 23:53:11 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17oAZ6-0005vB-00 for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 00:30:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17o9zR-0005v2-00; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 17:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17o9xp-0005lz-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 17:51:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17o9xn-0005ln-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 17:51:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17o9xm-0005lb-00; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 17:51:26 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 6513A7C013; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 21:51:19 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <5xy9aj3zo1.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Original-Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7719 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7719 storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > Richard Stallman writes: > > > Kim, what do you think of Miles' "close and then execute" proposal? > > I don't think either way... as I don't use the C-x e binding myself. > I have nothing against Miles' proposal, so if nobody else objects, I'll > change it to do just that [and keep C-x ) as is]. Since nobody objected, I have now changed it. So, when necessary, C-x e now terminates the macro before calling it. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk