From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c Date: 11 Feb 2002 10:41:43 +0100 Message-ID: <5xg048gxt4.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <200202110210.g1B2A2J06678@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013421141 30411 195.204.10.66 (11 Feb 2002 09:52:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Feb 2002 09:52:21 GMT Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16aD8G-0007uP-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:52:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16aCyP-0003TJ-00; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 04:42:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16aCwo-0003RK-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 04:40:30 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (kfs2.local.filanet.dk [192.168.1.182]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 787587C035 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:40:29 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200202110210.g1B2A2J06678@aztec.santafe.edu> Original-Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:993 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:993 Richard Stallman writes: > > E.g. if I bind the following function to both [f1 a] and [f1 b], > > and enter f1 a f1 b, it reports ESC O P b (rather than ESC O P a): > > > > (defun f1x (arg) > > (interactive "kEnter key: ") > > (message (key-description (this-single-command-raw-keys)))) > > I think it would be better to fix the code, but I don't have > time to do that myself. For now, I will fix the doc strings > and the manual, which is easier. If someone else wants to fix the > code, that is fine, but I think other things are more important. Well, if we document the way it works now, then code will eventually be written to rely on it (notably Stefan's original code which triggered this can be simplified significantly using the current behaviour). So I suggest to keep [and be satisfied with] the current (now documented) behaviour. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel