From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.. Date: 10 Sep 2002 23:50:56 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xfzwhv7i7.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <87lm6xiruh.fsf@computer.localdomain> <5xu1liwmu6.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208261526.g7QFQX624783@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xu1lgu1e4.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208271621.g7RGLNm30516@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xhehfe3aj.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5x4rdfdzu6.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208281413.g7SEDkT03872@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xvg5thgw8.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208291724.g7THOJZ11366@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xd6roult6.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031691168 22811 127.0.0.1 (10 Sep 2002 20:52:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 20:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, miles@gnu.org, deego@glue.umd.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17os06-0005vf-00 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 22:52:46 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17osag-0005j2-00 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 23:30:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17orzh-0006uc-00; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 16:52:21 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17ory7-0006kw-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 16:50:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17ory5-0006jw-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 16:50:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17ory5-0006jq-00; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 16:50:41 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 587077C017; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 20:50:39 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7820 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7820 Richard Stallman writes: > The question would be very annoying. I think it should terminate and > define the macro. If the user wants to ignore that definition, he > can. If the user wants to add to it, he can do that too. > > Someone suggested that the erring command should be omitted from the > macro. I agree, that is definitely desirable. That's what it does! -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk