From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: table.el 1.6.1 Date: 31 Mar 2002 22:40:18 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xeli0wjwt.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <20020319.212249.60850794.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> <200203210138.g2L1cum14295@rum.cs.yale.edu> <20020320.213722.110254553.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> <200203221226.g2MCQZa01737@aztec.santafe.edu> <5xbsdg3av0.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200203231614.g2NGExP02322@aztec.santafe.edu> <5xy9gj5hva.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200203252159.g2PLx9k14452@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5x8z8gffnq.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200203282048.g2SKm8g09712@aztec.santafe.edu> <5xofh8nurf.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200203300343.g2U3hu510223@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017603751 32383 127.0.0.1 (31 Mar 2002 19:42:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 19:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16rlDj-0008QC-00 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 21:42:31 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16rlOb-0005ja-00 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 21:53:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16rlDS-0002iy-00; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 14:42:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16rlAl-0002JD-00; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 14:39:27 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 6188B7C035; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 19:39:25 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200203300343.g2U3hu510223@aztec.santafe.edu> Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2284 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2284 Richard Stallman writes: > However, the current code executes the point-entered and point-left > property hooks as a consequence of point moving in and out of the same > interval. Is that intentional? > > I can't follow the meaning of that sentence. Would you please say it > more clearly? The point-entered and point-left properties are handled in set_point_both, so if point leaves and reenters the same interval due to executing a command, those hooks are executed (superfluously?) Since my idea of doing a mode-line update in the same place if an interval is left or entered -- and you argue that is not the proper place -- maybe you think it isn't the right place for the point-entered / point-left hooks either. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk